Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
62 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed December 2016
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the HX350 (20MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe WG-4 was revealed 3 years earlier than the HX350 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-4 grades vs the HX350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony HX350
| WG-4 | HX350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Ricoh WG-4
| HX350 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2016 | February 2014 | More modern by 34 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony HX350
| WG-4 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony HX350 has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 versus the HX350.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and HX350 is 90 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and HX350.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Sony HX350 to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2016-12-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 652g (1.44 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $330 | - |