Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released February 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony RX1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 was manufactured 12 months later than the RX1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WG-4 grades against the RX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony RX1
| WG-4 | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | February 2013 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Ricoh WG-4
| RX1 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony RX1
| WG-4 | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony RX1 has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony RX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 compared to the RX1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and RX1 is 90 and 79 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The graphic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and RX1.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Sony RX1 will show extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2013-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 482 gr (1.06 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 93 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 270 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $330 | $2,798 |