Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Newer Model is Sony RX1R II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) boast different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 was introduced 8 months after the RX1R and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the WG-4 matches up versus the RX1R with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony RX1R
| WG-4 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | June 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Ricoh WG-4
| RX1R | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony RX1R
| WG-4 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 offers external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony RX1R has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 vs the RX1R.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and RX1R is 90 and 79 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and RX1R.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX1R will give more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2013-06-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 482g (1.06 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 270 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $330 | $2,798 |