Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Newer Model is Sony RX1R II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) boast different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 was introduced 8 months after the RX1R and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the WG-4 matches up versus the RX1R with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony RX1R
| WG-4 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | June 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Ricoh WG-4
| RX1R | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony RX1R
| WG-4 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 offers external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony RX1R has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 vs the RX1R.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and RX1R is 90 and 79 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and RX1R.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX1R will give more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2013-06-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 482g (1.06 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 270 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $330 | $2,798 |