Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 was released 4 years after the S2000 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the WG-4 grades against the S2000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony S2000
| WG-4 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Ricoh WG-4
| S2000 | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony S2000
| WG-4 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 provides exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-4 versus the S2000.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and S2000 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and S2000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $330 | $225 |