Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony T900, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-4 was launched 5 years later than the T900 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 scores against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony T900
| WG-4 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | February 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh WG-4
| T900 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony T900
| WG-4 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 has got exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 and the T900.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and T900.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The newer WG-4 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $330 | $300 |