Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony TX100V, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 was launched 3 years later than the TX100V and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-4 scores versus the TX100V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony TX100V
WG-4 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 38 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Ricoh WG-4
TX100V | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony TX100V
WG-4 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 has external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony TX100V has sizing of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony TX100V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 versus the TX100V.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and TX100V is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and TX100V.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files though you should always consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent WG-4 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 147 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $330 | $380 |