Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Introduced July 2013
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony TX30, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the TX30 (18MP) is relatively close and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 was introduced 7 months after the TX30 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-4 scores against the TX30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony TX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony TX30
WG-4 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | July 2013 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX30 over the Ricoh WG-4
TX30 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony TX30
WG-4 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony TX30 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony TX30 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 against the TX30.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and TX30 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The image here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and TX30.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony TX30 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX30 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2013-07-26 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 141 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $330 | $230 |