Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
97 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Revealed February 2012
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony TX66, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the TX66 (18MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 was unveiled 24 months later than the TX66 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX66 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the WG-4 scores against the TX66 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony TX66
WG-4 | TX66 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Ricoh WG-4
TX66 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony TX66
WG-4 | TX66 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 provides exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony TX66 has proportions of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony TX66 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 and the TX66.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and TX66 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The visual below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and TX66.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Sony TX66 to give you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger WG-4 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony TX66 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 109g (0.24 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 250 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $330 | $350 |