Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony W320, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-4 was launched 4 years later than the W320 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-4 scores vs the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony W320
| WG-4 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2010 | Fresher by 50 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh WG-4
| W320 | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony W320
| WG-4 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WG-4 and the W320.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and W320 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and W320.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The younger WG-4 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 117 grams (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $330 | $269 |