Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2009
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and WX1 (10MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and WX1 (1/2.4") use totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 was revealed 4 years later than the WX1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the WG-4 grades vs the WX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony WX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony WX1
WG-4 | WX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | August 2009 | More recent by 55 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX1 over the Ricoh WG-4
WX1 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony WX1
WG-4 | WX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony WX1 has specifications of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 compared to the WX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and WX1 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and WX1.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will provide more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony WX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 160 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 149 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $330 | $149 |