Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d855c/d855c4cbe7d9d28e98143d16fe9df7ae12246ddd" alt="Samsung CL5 front Samsung CL5 front"
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung CL5, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was brought out 6 years later than the CL5 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-5 GPS grades versus the CL5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung CL5
WG-5 GPS | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 73 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
CL5 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung CL5
WG-5 GPS | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS features external dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung CL5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WG-5 GPS and the CL5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ae0c/0ae0c14318a9863cd55da2d208a8f424c09ffc1e" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and CL5 is 90 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5487/f5487a6777323507574eb7ce8db360dbbb578420" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The visual here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and CL5.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-5 GPS featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will provide you with extra detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger WG-5 GPS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4798c/4798c4a064cf898119b6e32fca861b4c348c9eae" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6e0c/f6e0c8eaa41b1b7edf80152509c52d367edf1d02" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung CL5 |
Also called as | - | PL10 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 14.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) | 141 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $500 | $391 |