Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung GX-1S, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was released 9 years later than the GX-1S and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WG-5 GPS scores against the GX-1S for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung GX-1S
WG-5 GPS | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2006 | Fresher by 111 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
GX-1S | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung GX-1S
WG-5 GPS | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS provides physical measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung GX-1S in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7d43/f7d43e37af22b0849394446b1ebdcc6028176da7" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and GX-1S is 90 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4da4/b4da4e23ff2efc6d2a42505b66e6104db6b9c797" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The visual here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and GX-1S.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-5 GPS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher WG-5 GPS should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbeea/cbeea95c4cc1cf7d7cc227317d3695a0e0a864af" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c784/8c7843ca84cc252361a4361ef93edadf1fb5e930" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung GX-1S |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236g (0.52 lb) | 605g (1.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $500 | $850 |