Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as WB500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-5 GPS was announced 5 years later than the HZ10W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-5 GPS scores vs the HZ10W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ10W. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung HZ10W
| WG-5 GPS | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 70 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| HZ10W | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ10W
| WG-5 GPS | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS offers outer dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-5 GPS and the HZ10W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and HZ10W is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-5 GPS and HZ10W.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to show more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer WG-5 GPS will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also Known as | - | WB500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 14.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) | 249 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $500 | $300 |