Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47851/478511a8a927c87f7bc64622b7ea2ec44bf09c1b" alt="Samsung HZ15W front Samsung HZ15W front"
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also referred to as WB550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Samsung HZ15W, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was announced 6 years after the HZ15W which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-5 GPS scores against the HZ15W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ15W. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung HZ15W
WG-5 GPS | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 73 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
HZ15W | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ15W
WG-5 GPS | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS enjoys external dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Samsung HZ15W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the HZ15W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0643/d06430c3fa33e0b91500c545f077924b9d312560" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and HZ15W is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e195d/e195d51e542dc87adc5293e3556d6171120b712a" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and HZ15W.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to deliver more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer WG-5 GPS provides an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cbed/9cbed814b0a99c27b6d8e8f69f4bf7a3b786d2b8" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15281/1528172df0a1d98b5b42d398b6559ddf106e8e2a" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ15W |
Also referred to as | - | WB550 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236 gr (0.52 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $500 | $330 |