Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as WB5000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-5 GPS was brought out 4 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-5 GPS matches up against the HZ25W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung HZ25W
| WG-5 GPS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 56 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| HZ25W | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ25W
| WG-5 GPS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS provides outside dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS and the HZ25W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The pic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and HZ25W.
All in all, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-5 GPS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Portrait photography with Samsung HZ25W
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
manual focus
supports RAW formats
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Street photography factors
Samsung HZ25W Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than average (236 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography features
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (240 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Travel photography advice
Samsung HZ25W Travel photography advice
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than average (236g)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
built-in flash
decently wide (26mm)
great reach (624mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Landscape photography factors
Samsung HZ25W Landscape photography factors
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
not so great battery life (240 per charge)
manual focus
decently wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Vlogging factors
Samsung HZ25W Vlogging factors
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than average (236 grams)
decently wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 14.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $500 | $350 |