Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da11d/da11d6967e1ef4aa2862495fa7f379f18dc98f62" alt="Samsung HZ30W front Samsung HZ30W front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as WB600
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ30W, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was revealed 5 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the WG-5 GPS matches up against the HZ30W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ30W. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung HZ30W
WG-5 GPS | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 62 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
HZ30W | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ30W
WG-5 GPS | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS enjoys outside measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ30W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the HZ30W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/547d6/547d6223d5d66848946a949e2446240e9ee45c9d" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and HZ30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf36c/cf36c670d86787ea974c9a106100420f5d133a8a" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The photograph here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and HZ30W.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent WG-5 GPS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/858b2/858b2ba28132db55413bf87c161bb1811b68e9ab" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4906/c4906e1bd39dbd7de7d0497c8e0abe3c79eeb947" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ30W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB600 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236g (0.52 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $500 | $280 |