Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-6
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-5 GPS was revealed 4 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the WG-5 GPS scores against the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung HZ35W
| WG-5 GPS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| HZ35W | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung HZ35W
| WG-5 GPS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS comes with exterior measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specifications. The picture below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-5 GPS and HZ35W.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to produce extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher WG-5 GPS provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Street photography with Samsung HZ35W
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than others in class (236g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (245g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (240 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking focus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Travel photography information
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography information
environment proof
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery pack (240 CIPA)
heavier than others in class (236 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
lighter than competition (245g)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Landscape photography information
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography information
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
environment proof
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
not so great battery pack (240 shots)
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
quite wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
heavier than others in class (236g)
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than competition (245 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236g (0.52 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $500 | $300 |
