Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung MV800, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-5 GPS was brought out 3 years later than the MV800 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-5 GPS matches up vs the MV800 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung MV800
WG-5 GPS | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | September 2011 | More recent by 42 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
MV800 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung MV800
WG-5 GPS | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS offers outside dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has proportions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung MV800 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-5 GPS compared to the MV800.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and MV800 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-5 GPS and MV800.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you should always consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more recent WG-5 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung MV800 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2011-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Micro SD |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $500 | $499 |