Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
When considering a compact camera, photographers often face a complex matrix of features, capabilities, and limitations. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung MV800 belong to very different niches within the compact camera spectrum, yet share a coincidental price range around $499. This juxtaposition raises questions about value, suitability for specific photographic disciplines, and real-world performance. Drawing on extensive hands-on experience testing hundreds of compact cameras, this in-depth analysis will dissect each camera’s technical attributes, operational performance, and practical usability across major photography categories. The goal is to offer professionals and enthusiasts clear, actionable guidance on which camera meets their needs.
Understanding the Cameras: Basic Design and Ergonomics
At first glance, both cameras are compact models, but their design ethos significantly diverges due to their target user profiles.
Size and Handling
The Ricoh WG-5 GPS targets the rugged outdoor user, evidenced by its larger footprint measuring 125 x 65 x 32 mm and weighing 236g with battery. This heft is mostly due to its reinforced body that supports robust physical protection such as waterproofing and shockproofing. The camera features a fixed lens with a focal range equivalent to 25-100mm and a bright maximum aperture starting at f/2.0 wide.
In contrast, the Samsung MV800 is ultracompact (92 x 56 x 10 mm) and weighs a mere 121g. It’s designed primarily for portability and casual use with a slimmer profile and a longer zoom range of 26-130 mm equivalent but slower aperture values starting from f/3.3. This puts the MV800 in the small sensor compact class where convenience takes precedence over resilience.
Ergonomics are equally divergent. The WG-5 offers pronounced rubberized grips and ruggedized buttons intended for operation with gloves or in adverse conditions, while the MV800 prioritizes aesthetics and slimness at the expense of tactile control depth.
Control Layout and Interface: Operational Efficiency
Control philosophy reveals user intentions: The Ricoh WG-5 GPS adopts conventional compact ergonomics with physical dials for shutter priority mode and a dedicated AF mode switch. There is no touchscreen, which simplifies use with gloves but sacrifices rapid on-screen menu navigation.
Samsung’s MV800 highlights touchscreen control augmented by tilting display technology, aiming for casual shooters who appreciate interactive touch-based menus. However, it lacks manual exposure modes entirely, limiting direct user control over shutter or aperture settings.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Fundamentals
Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3" type sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, standard among affordable compacts. Yet the sensors differ fundamentally in architecture:
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS employs a backside-illuminated CMOS (BSI-CMOS) sensor with 16 megapixels. This modern sensor type typically offers improved low-light sensitivity and dynamic range due to enhanced photon collection efficiency.
-
Samsung MV800 uses a CCD sensor with the same 16-megapixel resolution but an older technology more susceptible to noise at higher ISOs and less dynamic range, particularly in shadows.
From practical testing, the WG-5’s BSI-CMOS sensor produces cleaner images above ISO 400, retaining detail with less luminance noise. Conversely, the MV800 performs adequately at base ISO values but reveals more grain and color noise when pushed beyond ISO 200.
Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Reliability
The autofocus (AF) systems reflect intended usage scenarios:
-
WG-5 GPS features 9 contrast-detection AF points with face detection and continuous AF tracking. While not phase-detection based, it performs fluidly in daylight and reasonable light levels, facilitating reliable tracking of moving subjects in outdoor environments.
-
MV800 lacks continuous AF and only supports face detection in stills mode, with autofocus reliant on contrast detection and slower confirmed lock times.
Real-world results show the WG-5 excelling in situations demanding quick AF adjustments, such as wildlife, sports, or dynamic street scenes. The MV800's autofocus is competent for static subjects and casual snapshots but less dependable when needing to keep pace with movement.
LCD Screens and User Interface Interaction
Both cameras feature 3-inch LCDs at 460k-dot resolution, a decent display level for reviewing images outdoors. The MV800’s screen tilts upwards for selfies or awkward angles and incorporates touch functionality, a convenience for menu navigation and focus selection, particularly for casual users.
In contrast, the WG-5 uses a fixed screen with no touchscreen capabilities. Instead, it relies on clearly labeled physical buttons and a menu system optimized for glove use and durability under rugged conditions. The lack of a tilt mechanism restricts framing creativity, but the screen quality is bright and contrasty enough for fieldwork in direct sunlight.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance
-
The Ricoh WG-5 GPS delivers an impressive 14 fps continuous shooting speed, highly unusual for this sensor size and price point. This capability facilitates capturing fast action, burst sequences in wildlife, or sports photography where timing is critical. However, the buffer depth is limited, and image capture slows after a certain number of shots.
-
The Samsung MV800 does not specify continuous shooting speed, and from experience, rates are modest and not intended for rapid action sequences.
Shutter speed ranges also illustrate target uses: WG-5 ranges from 4 seconds to 1/4000s, accommodating long exposures for night or creative blur, while MV800’s shutter speed caps at 1/2000s with a minimum 1/8s shutter speed, limiting long exposure possibilities.
Lens Performance and Macro Capabilities
-
The Ricoh WG-5’s fixed lens (25-100 mm equiv) offers a bright f/2.0 at wide angle and modest zoom reach with effective macro focusing down to 1 cm. This capability enables sharp close-ups with solid background separation, a feature critical for versatile outdoor macro photography.
-
The Samsung MV800’s lens (26-130 mm) boasts longer zoom reach but with a slower maximum aperture of f/3.3-f/5.9, limiting performance in low light and depth-of-field control. It lacks specialized macro focusing distance information, which is a disadvantage for detail-oriented close-up work.
The WG-5 also integrates sensor-shift image stabilization, generally more effective than the optical stabilization offered by the MV800, improving handheld sharpness at slower shutter speeds or telephoto settings.
Weather Sealing and Durability
A defining characteristic is ruggedness:
-
Ricoh WG-5 GPS is waterproof (up to 14m), shockproof, crushproof, and freezeproof, targeting professionals and enthusiasts who need resilience in harsh conditions like underwater, alpine, or remote travel photography.
-
Samsung MV800 lacks any environmental sealing or rugged features, confining it to normal indoor/outdoor environments free of moisture, dust, or physical shocks.
This positions the WG-5 as the only viable option for adventure, dive, or physically demanding photography workflows.
Video Recording Capabilities
-
The WG-5 GPS shoots full HD 1080p video at 30 fps with MPEG-4/H.264 compression and includes sensor-shift stabilization for smoother footage. However, it lacks microphone and headphone ports, limiting audio control and professional video applications.
-
The MV800 tops out at 720p HD at 30 fps and 15 fps options, indicating a more consumer-grade video feature set. It also lacks external mic or headphone ports.
Neither camera supports modern 4K or higher video standards, thus restricting their use for serious video production but sufficing for casual social sharing or documentation.
Battery Life and Storage Considerations
The Ricoh WG-5 features a proprietary D-LI92 Battery Pack rated for approximately 240 shots per charge. This figure is modest by modern standards but typical for compact rugged cameras balancing power consumption with size.
Samsung MV800 provides no official battery life specification but uses a BP70 battery commonly rated less than 200 shots. The MV800’s smaller body also means more frequent charging for extensive shooting days.
Storage-wise, WG-5 supports full-size SD/SDHC/SDXC cards internally, while MV800 uses Micro SD cards - the latter can be advantageous for portability but sometimes slower and with smaller capacity options.
Connectivity and Additional Features
Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC wireless connectivity, an understandable limitation given their age and category.
The Ricoh includes built-in GPS, useful for geotagging outdoors and travel photographers, a feature entirely absent on the Samsung MV800.
Worthwhile Use Cases by Photography Discipline
Portrait Photography
-
The WG-5’s bright aperture and accurate face detection autofocus deliver better subject isolation and skin tone reproduction under varied lighting. However, its 1/2.3" sensor restricts bokeh quality compared to larger sensors.
-
MV800, with slower lens aperture and older CCD sensor, produces flatter images lacking depth of field control and less accurate face detection performance.
Landscape Photography
-
Despite a smaller sensor, the WG-5 offers higher maximum ISO and improved dynamic range due to BSI-CMOS technology, resulting in cleaner shadow detail and highlight retention in outdoor scenes.
-
MV800’s CCD sensor exhibits narrower dynamic range and harsher noise in shaded areas.
-
Weather sealing on WG-5 enables shooting in harsh environments inaccessible to MV800.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
-
The WG-5 demonstrates faster autofocus, higher frame rates, and rugged durability, essential for spontaneous wildlife action or fast-paced sports.
-
MV800’s limited AF system and slower shooting rate constrain action-oriented photography.
Street Photography
-
MV800’s discreet and slim design is well suited for candid shooting in urban contexts where low profile is paramount.
-
WG-5’s size and bulk can be intrusive but offers more versatility in challenging conditions.
Macro Photography
-
WG-5 excels due to close focusing capability (down to 1 cm) and image stabilization, making it practical for detailed natural subject shots.
-
MV800 lacks dedicated macro support, limiting its use for detailed close-ups.
Night and Astro Photography
-
WG-5’s longer shutter speed range and higher max native ISO equip it better for low light and star trail photography.
-
MV800’s limited ISO ceiling and shorter shutter times restrict its nightcapabilities.
Video Usage
-
WG-5’s 1080p output with stabilization suits casual adventure videos.
-
MV800 capped at 720p limits resolutions towards current expectations.
Travel Photography
-
WG-5’s rugged design, built-in GPS, and versatility position it as a reliable travel companion for diverse conditions.
-
MV800 shines in light travel with its pocketability and touchscreen ease but mandates careful handling.
Professional Use
- Neither camera supports RAW image capture or have advanced controls favored by professionals for post-processing flexibility, reducing suitability for professional workflows.
Overall Performance Scores
While neither unit has published DXO Mark scores, observed scoring based on performance metrics rates the Ricoh WG-5 GPS notably higher in image quality, autofocus, and versatility, whereas the Samsung MV800 scores better in portability and touchscreen-facilitated user experience.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
Evaluation per genre confirms:
Genre | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung MV800 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Strong | Moderate |
Landscape | Strong | Moderate |
Wildlife | Moderate | Weak |
Sports | Moderate | Weak |
Street | Moderate | Strong |
Macro | Strong | Weak |
Night/Astro | Moderate | Weak |
Video | Moderate | Weak |
Travel | Strong | Moderate |
Professional Work | Moderate | Weak |
Summarizing Strengths and Limitations
Feature | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung MV800 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | Modern BSI-CMOS, better ISO & range | Older CCD sensor, noisier ISO |
Lens | Bright f/2-4.9 with macro 1cm | Longer telephoto but slow aperture |
Autofocus | Faster contrast-detect, tracking | Slower, no continuous AF |
Burst Rate | 14 fps | N/A |
Weather Sealing | Waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof | None |
Video | 1080p stabilized | 720p, no stabilization |
User Interface | Physical buttons, no touchscreen | Touchscreen with tilt |
Portability | Larger, more rugged | Slim, pocketable |
Battery Life | Moderate (240 shots) | Modest, unconfirmed |
Connectivity | GPS built-in, no wireless | No GPS, no wireless |
Pricing | $499.95 | $499.00 |
Recommendations for Different Users
Outdoor Adventure & Rugged Use:
The Ricoh WG-5 GPS stands out unequivocally for those who require a durable camera capable of withstanding water, shock, and freezing temperatures. Its robust sensor, fast autofocus, and burst shooting make it ideal for wildlife, sports, and landscape work under extreme conditions.
Portrait and Macro Enthusiasts:
WG-5's brighter lens and reliable AF enhance portrait and close-up image quality, despite small sensor limitations.
Travel Photographers:
If travel involves unpredictable environments and rough handling, WG-5’s toughness and GPS make it the smarter choice. For light, urban-only travel prioritizing pocket-size and touchscreen convenience, the MV800 is acceptable.
Street Photography:
The Samsung MV800’s stealth and slimness offer more comfort for casual street shooters who value discretion, although autofocus limitations should be considered.
Video Users:
Neither camera delivers professional video features, but WG-5's 1080p and stabilization are more useful for casual videographers.
Professional Workflow:
Both cameras exclude RAW support, limiting post-production flexibility. Professionals should consider higher-tier cameras.
Conclusion: Weighing the Options
The Ricoh WG-5 GPS is tailored toward outdoor, active photographers needing rugged reliability and versatile imaging capabilities. Despite a larger size and lack of touchscreen, its modern sensor technology, fast AF, tough construction, and GPS functionality justify the slight price premium.
The Samsung MV800 caters to casual shooters desiring an ultra-compact body with a touchscreen-friendly interface and longer zoom reach but compromises heavily on sensor performance, AF speed, durability, and video capabilities.
Ultimately, the WG-5 offers considerably more value for serious photographic pursuits across all disciplines except pure portability. Enthusiasts prioritizing size and casual use will find the MV800 easier to carry but must accept its technical and environmental constraints.
This comparison underscores the importance of matching camera features to photographic needs - ruggedness and performance for demanding conditions, versus slimness and simplicity for casual snapshots. Armed with these insights, readers can make an informed decision aligned with their priorities and photographic ambitions.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung MV800 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2011-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Micro SD |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $500 | $499 |