Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL102, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-5 GPS was revealed 6 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WG-5 GPS grades versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung SL102
| WG-5 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 75 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SL102 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL102
| WG-5 GPS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has outer dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the SL102.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The pic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-5 GPS and SL102.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to deliver greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer WG-5 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternate name | - | ES55 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $500 | $130 |