Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL202, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-5 GPS was released 6 years after the SL202 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-5 GPS scores versus the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung SL202
| WG-5 GPS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 73 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SL202 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL202
| WG-5 GPS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has got outer dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the SL202.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-5 GPS and SL202.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to render extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern WG-5 GPS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $500 | $140 |