Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-5 GPS was introduced 4 years after the ST700 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-5 GPS grades against the ST700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung ST700. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung ST700
WG-5 GPS | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | January 2011 | Newer by 50 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
ST700 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung ST700
WG-5 GPS | ST700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS comes with exterior dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung ST700 has proportions of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the ST700.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and ST700 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and ST700.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of images but you should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher WG-5 GPS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung ST700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung ST700 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | - |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $500 | $280 |