Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is ST50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-5 GPS was launched 6 years later than the TL100 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the TL100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung TL100. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung TL100
| WG-5 GPS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 | January 2009 | More recent by 75 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TL100 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL100
| WG-5 GPS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS features outside measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL100 has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the TL100.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and TL100 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and TL100.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-5 GPS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL100 |
| Also called as | - | ST50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236g (0.52 lb) | 219g (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $22 |