Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
91 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is ST50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-5 GPS was launched 6 years later than the TL100 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the TL100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung TL100. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung TL100
| WG-5 GPS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 75 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TL100 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL100
| WG-5 GPS | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS features outside measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL100 has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the TL100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and TL100 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and TL100.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-5 GPS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL100 |
| Also called as | - | ST50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236g (0.52 lb) | 219g (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $22 |
