Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Also referred to as ST550
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Samsung TL225, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe WG-5 GPS was unveiled 5 years after the TL225 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-5 GPS scores against the TL225 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung TL225. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung TL225
| WG-5 GPS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 | August 2009 | Newer by 67 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TL225 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1152k | 460k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL225
| WG-5 GPS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has got outside dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-5 GPS vs the TL225.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and TL225 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and TL225.
All in all, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-5 GPS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL225 |
| Also called as | - | ST550 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) | 187 grams (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $500 | $488 |