Clicky

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225

Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
44
Overall
42
Ricoh WG-5 GPS front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Announced August 2009
  • Also referred to as ST550
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Overview

The following is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Samsung TL225, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-5 GPS was unveiled 5 years after the TL225 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-5 GPS scores against the TL225 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung TL225

 WG-5 GPS TL225 
AnnouncedFebruary 2015August 2009Newer by 67 months
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 TL225 WG-5 GPS 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1152k460kSharper screen (+692k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL225

 WG-5 GPS TL225 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has got outside dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-5 GPS vs the TL225.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and TL225 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-5 GPS and TL225.

All in all, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-5 GPS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Portrait photography information
Samsung TL225 Portrait photography information
41
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Street photography features
Samsung TL225 Street photography features
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (236g)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
has touch to focus
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than average (187g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography information
Samsung TL225 Sports photography information
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (240 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Travel photography camera
69
environment sealing
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
low battery pack (240 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (236 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
59
has touch to focus
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (187g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Landscape photography with Samsung TL225
54
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low battery pack (240 per charge)
37
rather wide (27mm)
very good size screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Vlogging info
Samsung TL225 Vlogging info
34
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (236g)
29
rather wide (27mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic support
heavier than average (187 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL225
 Ricoh WG-5 GPSSamsung TL225
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-5 GPS Samsung TL225
Also called as - ST550
Type Waterproof Ultracompact
Released 2015-02-10 2009-08-13
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 125 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 1,152k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 14.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 236 grams (0.52 pounds) 187 grams (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $500 $488