Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-5 GPS was introduced 6 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung TL320
| WG-5 GPS | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 73 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TL320 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL320
| WG-5 GPS | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS comes with external measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-5 GPS and the TL320.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and TL320 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and TL320.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to show greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-5 GPS will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL320 |
| Alternate name | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $500 | $380 |