Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-5 GPS was introduced 6 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung TL320
| WG-5 GPS | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 73 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TL320 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung TL320
| WG-5 GPS | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS comes with external measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-5 GPS and the TL320.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and TL320 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and TL320.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to show greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-5 GPS will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung TL320 |
| Alternate name | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $500 | $380 |