Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f8c8/6f8c814a576e69cce860c8dcb4236d1e91ce58db" alt="Samsung WB210 front Samsung WB210 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB210, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was introduced 3 years after the WB210 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-5 GPS matches up vs the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung WB210
WG-5 GPS | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 44 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 1k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
WB210 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB210
WG-5 GPS | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS enjoys outer measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-5 GPS vs the WB210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1625c/1625c50adb3d6a846f8e8c8e2acc92a9d7774aac" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and WB210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cac6/4cac63c3af89b5250e4075c33d0faf4e5e827bee" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-5 GPS and WB210.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to produce greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern WG-5 GPS provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eb93/7eb935ab915061d1c0122a4b15fd1d500572672c" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e301/6e30164c6026a7bcbe51d2b4f2c5e70d3aaf7e70" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB210 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-02-10 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 236g (0.52 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $500 | $279 |