Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-5 GPS was announced 2 years after the WB30F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the WG-5 GPS grades against the WB30F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung WB30F
| WG-5 GPS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| WB30F | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB30F
| WG-5 GPS | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has outside dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the WB30F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and WB30F is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-5 GPS and WB30F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you might want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more modern WG-5 GPS is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 14.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $500 | $180 |