Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-5 GPS was released 2 years later than the WB800F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-5 GPS grades vs the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Samsung WB800F
| WG-5 GPS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| WB800F | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Samsung WB800F
| WG-5 GPS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has got outside measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-5 GPS vs the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and WB800F.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of files though you will need to consider the age of the products into consideration. The fresher WG-5 GPS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 236 gr (0.52 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $500 | $300 |