Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31307/31307f578b4c97bbaccb2a84c69e5c0772bdeaaa" alt="Sigma DP2x front Sigma DP2x front"
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Released February 2011
- Replaced the Sigma DP2s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and DP2x (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was revealed 4 years later than the DP2x and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the WG-5 GPS grades versus the DP2x in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sigma DP2x. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sigma DP2x
WG-5 GPS | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 49 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
DP2x | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sigma DP2x
WG-5 GPS | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS comes with outer measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sigma DP2x has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the DP2x.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/354c4/354c4a0a02ae0583e8456bbd636b1a931c19decb" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and DP2x is 90 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd37f/bd37f19ad6a78ccc740d1d9454afa30b54de5128" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-5 GPS and DP2x.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-5 GPS with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will give more detail because of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more modern WG-5 GPS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd2ee/cd2ee2398f60911d2193156b7ef0dff7625a1bf7" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc9b5/dc9b54d6c55cc01d15f6a64257ceeda17cbeebe4" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sigma DP2x |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-02-10 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) | 280 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $500 | $699 |