Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Launched October 2019
- Superseded the Sony A9
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony A9 II, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and A9 II (Full frame) possess totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-5 GPS was revealed 5 years before the A9 II which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the WG-5 GPS scores vs the A9 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sony A9 II
WG-5 GPS | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
A9 II | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | February 2015 | Newer by 56 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 460k | Crisper screen (+980k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony A9 II
WG-5 GPS | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS provides external measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony A9 II has specifications of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony A9 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the WG-5 GPS compared to the A9 II.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-5 GPS and A9 II is 90 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and A9 II.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-5 GPS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A9 II will resolve greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged WG-5 GPS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Type | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-02-10 | 2019-10-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 14.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) | 678 grams (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 690 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Cost at release | $500 | $4,498 |