Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
- Superseded the Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony NEX-C3, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-5 GPS was brought out 3 years after the NEX-C3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WG-5 GPS matches up against the NEX-C3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sony NEX-C3
WG-5 GPS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
NEX-C3 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony NEX-C3
WG-5 GPS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS features exterior measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has proportions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2083/d20834360d873c857873d99d72cb0272a7ccbf9c" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and NEX-C3 is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37482/37482b5cd4509a353573a6923b8dddade80b2662" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-5 GPS and NEX-C3.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The WG-5 GPS uses the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher. The more modern WG-5 GPS should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f797/4f7979a1bfc7ed7097e9b6b0f7fe98871364c0a8" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80127/801276213b480bb7ec5616f9c3924dbe9d7dc473" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 236g (0.52 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 400 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $500 | $343 |