Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
62 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Superseded the Sony HX300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Sony HX400V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the HX400V (20MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-5 GPS was revealed 13 months later than the HX400V making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-5 GPS matches up vs the HX400V for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sony HX400V
| WG-5 GPS | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | February 2014 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| HX400V | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony HX400V
| WG-5 GPS | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS has got outer measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony HX400V has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-5 GPS versus Sony HX400V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-5 GPS compared to the HX400V.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-5 GPS and HX400V is 90 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and HX400V.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX400V to offer greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The newer WG-5 GPS should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 14.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 236g (0.52 pounds) | 660g (1.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $448 |