Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-5 GPS was revealed 6 years after the T900 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-5 GPS grades versus the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-5 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sony T900
| WG-5 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 73 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| T900 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony T900
| WG-5 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS features physical measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-5 GPS against the T900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-5 GPS and T900.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-5 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 14.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $500 | $300 |