Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony W220, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-5 GPS (16MP) and W220 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-5 GPS was brought out 6 years after the W220 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-5 GPS scores versus the W220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery and Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Sony W220
| WG-5 GPS | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 75 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| W220 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony W220
| WG-5 GPS | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-5 GPS provides outer measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony W220 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Sony W220 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-5 GPS versus the W220.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-5 GPS and W220 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-5 GPS and W220.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern WG-5 GPS will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 14.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 236 gr (0.52 lb) | 147 gr (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $500 | $160 |