Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d855c/d855c4cbe7d9d28e98143d16fe9df7ae12246ddd" alt="Samsung CL5 front Samsung CL5 front"
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-50 was brought out 8 years after the CL5 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-50 scores versus the CL5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung CL5
WG-50 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh WG-50
CL5 | WG-50 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung CL5
WG-50 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display size |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-50 versus the CL5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82f16/82f160fb1397965ce55ad8bd351839a1c5e67564" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0577a/0577a85ff4c67d8a5fed7aea8216897d10d7d9ec" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and CL5.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-50 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-50 will provide you with more detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger WG-50 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/221c4/221c4715dba13fe093c1a9654a02ba470da43e4f" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/499a6/499a63cedaae26820c62207419619f03aab52d62" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung CL5 |
Alternate name | - | PL10 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) | 141 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $280 | $391 |