Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung EX2F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-50 was unveiled 4 years after the EX2F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-50 matches up versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung EX2F
WG-50 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 54 months |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh WG-50
EX2F | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung EX2F
WG-50 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 has got outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/219ae/219ae2205266715e5c5e3125775a1959fee66ad3" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9865/e98655539bb9ad2b1e66ce4adb31e8cd1c489fee" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and EX2F.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will give greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6c22/f6c2246949e575277acfbf5852a0bae413c099b7" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da26e/da26e8fa718bd9e30574e3be6fe782514dc2cd36" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $280 | $478 |