Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung EX2F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-50 was unveiled 4 years after the EX2F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-50 matches up versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung EX2F
WG-50 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | December 2012 | More modern by 54 months | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh WG-50
EX2F | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung EX2F
WG-50 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 has got outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the EX2F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and EX2F.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will give greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $280 | $478 |