Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung EX2F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-50 was unveiled 4 years after the EX2F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-50 matches up versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung EX2F
| WG-50 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 | December 2012 | More modern by 54 months | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX2F | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung EX2F
| WG-50 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 has got outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the EX2F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and EX2F.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will give greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2017-05-24 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $280 | $478 |