Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is WB550
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung HZ15W, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-50 was released 8 years after the HZ15W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-50 grades vs the HZ15W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung HZ15W
| WG-50 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 101 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Ricoh WG-50
| HZ15W | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung HZ15W
| WG-50 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 offers exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung HZ15W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-50 against the HZ15W.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and HZ15W is 91 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and HZ15W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer WG-50 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB550 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $280 | $330 |