Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Launched May 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-50 was launched 7 years later than the HZ50W and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-50 grades against the HZ50W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung HZ50W. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung HZ50W
WG-50 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | May 2010 | Fresher by 86 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh WG-50
HZ50W | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung HZ50W
WG-50 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 features outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-50 against the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04c22/04c2274521bdac3a3fb81994c58d6c7dba4e239c" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and HZ50W is 91 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a1df/5a1df32e1cb6333056dcb1441c22c990fdacd292" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The visual below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and HZ50W.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68378/68378718ff05cf3717784597e1c9414162894ec6" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6746/f6746f9fd21b711ffd6c27b1e2ec71d0ac9b1dee" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung HZ50W |
Also called | - | WB5500 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2010-05-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 426 grams (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $280 | $250 |