Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2491/d249142fd1ea91e21b63cc2a3bc9c2efac68818a" alt="Samsung NX10 front Samsung NX10 front"
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Released April 2010
- Refreshed by Samsung NX11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the NX10 (15MP) is very well matched but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and NX10 (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-50 was released 7 years later than the NX10 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the WG-50 scores versus the NX10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung NX10. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung NX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung NX10
WG-50 | NX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | April 2010 | Fresher by 87 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX10 over the Ricoh WG-50
NX10 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX10
WG-50 | NX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX10 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") along with a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-50 versus the NX10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea40d/ea40dacd4333a1ce2893b9e71f9aa9435a56fa90" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and NX10 is 91 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb04b/bb04b9c28ea726e7d9dcfda835bc9fa151e6311e" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The visual below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and NX10.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-50 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh WG-50 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The newer WG-50 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e69f5/e69f5652fee1745a52ab9e66dc276a3fe51759ed" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e62c6/e62c6afc9330e1cee39641d5973d7e9c23a4b842" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX10 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX10 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2010-04-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 920 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 11.00 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 499g (1.10 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 572 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 400 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $280 | $626 |