Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5277/b527708835db132b53ec37264dc6230bff75beef" alt="Samsung NX100 front Samsung NX100 front"
88 Imaging
55 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Announced September 2010
- Replacement is Samsung NX200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the NX100 (15MP) is relatively comparable but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and NX100 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-50 was announced 6 years later than the NX100 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-50 matches up versus the NX100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung NX100. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung NX100
WG-50 | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | September 2010 | More recent by 82 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Ricoh WG-50
NX100 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX100
WG-50 | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 has got physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung NX100 has sizing of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-50 vs the NX100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88b4/d88b430d9c8137d351c836f95b1aea451de8d4b7" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and NX100 is 91 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bcf9/6bcf9d75cc5d1d495ac599bb9a6c3cd688ca6522" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and NX100.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-50 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh WG-50 will provide greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d53d5/d53d51e6a773f441512eed907efe34bfc02e1e9f" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f9a3/3f9a336b0cc5d7f71d4b5ebbf7bc8003bdf09280" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX100 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2010-09-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | VGA AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 282g (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 62 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 563 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 420 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $280 | $386 |