Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30878/3087870e2a184bb7b129e14c5c1172ecd9956fa4" alt="Samsung NX1000 front Samsung NX1000 front"
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Released April 2012
- Later Model is Samsung NX1100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX1000, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the NX1000 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and NX1000 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-50 was manufactured 5 years after the NX1000 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the WG-50 scores against the NX1000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung NX1000. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung NX1000
WG-50 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | April 2012 | Newer by 63 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Ricoh WG-50
NX1000 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX1000
WG-50 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung NX1000 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-50 and the NX1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91c66/91c6608cec1f588cb38cec67f11bfe8bab9d51b0" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and NX1000 is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6fb1/e6fb1ca301762f12a518b4a534dcb13f70df1400" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The pic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and NX1000.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-50 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX1000 will give extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 provides an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af55/7af55f10af2c643da5f4fc08a5bf17ee7c2876c5" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fe98/8fe9874d077cb4973cb759d938b917c3fa9c4750" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX1000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2012-04-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 320 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $280 | $388 |