Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/083e2/083e2627ee16c701325d05e6125ad917fcb73074" alt="Samsung NX11 front Samsung NX11 front"
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Revealed December 2010
- Old Model is Samsung NX10
- New Model is Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is very well matched but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and NX11 (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-50 was unveiled 6 years after the NX11 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the WG-50 matches up against the NX11 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX11. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung NX11
WG-50 | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | December 2010 | More modern by 78 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Ricoh WG-50
NX11 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX11
WG-50 | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung NX11 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-50 compared to the NX11.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ce1/e2ce153d1c5dbfe9ad58fd14b23db283f7fad6f1" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and NX11 is 91 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01598/01598a4a5609c1b035833fe26e921c8b82e557bc" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and NX11.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh WG-50 will give more detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The newer WG-50 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00912/009125ae758c1f4c5f48ca2ee020a649604f99d8" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdd78/fdd7872ee1c80d1f6e515583e46e11d119e350c5" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX11 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 11.00 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 499 gr (1.10 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $280 | $626 |