Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX210
- Replacement is Samsung NX500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is pretty similar but the WG-50 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-50 was revealed 3 years later than the NX300 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the WG-50 grades vs the NX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung NX300. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung NX300
WG-50 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | November 2013 | More recent by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Ricoh WG-50
NX300 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+538k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung NX300
WG-50 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the NX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca132/ca13255fba974b611864a833db8ced5ca42b9cca" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and NX300 is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ede3/0ede34072c5d4a66b3373b5bdc488533d2dbdf38" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The visual below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and NX300.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-50 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX300 will offer you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer WG-50 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5511/e55119f0131af6deec24f8cefb526448d6badb99" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81662/816628467340368a00862ba457f64804ddb24250" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung NX300 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 331g (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $280 | $750 |