Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SH100, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-50 was launched 6 years after the SH100 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-50 grades vs the SH100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung SH100. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung SH100
| WG-50 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 | January 2011 | Newer by 78 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Ricoh WG-50
| SH100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SH100
| WG-50 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 has got exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SH100 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SH100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-50 and the SH100.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and SH100 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and SH100.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SH100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | On, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $280 | $200 |