Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
99 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SH100, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-50 was launched 6 years after the SH100 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-50 grades vs the SH100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung SH100. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung SH100
| WG-50 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 | January 2011 | Newer by 78 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Ricoh WG-50
| SH100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SH100
| WG-50 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 has got exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SH100 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SH100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-50 and the SH100.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and SH100 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and SH100.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SH100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | On, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $280 | $200 |