Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-50 was brought out 8 years after the SL102 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-50 scores against the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung SL102
| WG-50 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 102 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh WG-50
| SL102 | WG-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SL102
| WG-50 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-50 compared to the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-50 and SL102.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to result in more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2017-05-24 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $130 |
