Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b182/9b182629722a25b5055a8beb15efd8706ee32948" alt="Samsung SL30 front Samsung SL30 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also referred to as ES15
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SL30, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and SL30 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-50 was introduced 8 years after the SL30 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the WG-50 matches up versus the SL30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung SL30. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung SL30
WG-50 | SL30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Ricoh WG-50
SL30 | WG-50 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SL30
WG-50 | SL30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 has got outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SL30 has measurements of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SL30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the SL30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71881/718817f946c7c3cf323ae5d7fe50245904bb4c75" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and SL30 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b94c8/b94c883ef65eaeb2a012ce68198a688c5c2961ea" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and SL30.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25340/253405dd32b261782f96c27779a7c287b440d62d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d65fb/d65fbaf66a95f876d7554a3777a1fd77d3aded9f" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL30 |
Also called | - | ES15 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 140g (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $280 | $93 |