Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-50 was released 8 years after the SL620 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-50 scores vs the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung SL620
| WG-50 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh WG-50
| SL620 | WG-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SL620
| WG-50 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 has got physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-50 and the SL620.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and SL620.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $280 | $200 |
