Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ac2e/3ac2ec410ac86be34c3479c4117466c247b1411d" alt="Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a5cc/0a5cc7b9983c113fe209f782afc9571c03761a19" alt="Samsung SL820 front Samsung SL820 front"
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is IT100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SL820, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-50 was announced 8 years later than the SL820 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-50 matches up versus the SL820 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung SL820. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung SL820
WG-50 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 101 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh WG-50
SL820 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung SL820
WG-50 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 has got external measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has sizing of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-50 versus Samsung SL820 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-50 versus the SL820.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16aab/16aabf02dd89a5946cdc747a8362a1cd97839ba8" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and SL820 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dffd9/dffd9fe8eb95804d882dd0d4a6e6cd6d88e07769" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and SL820.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to result in more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cab/47cab05f092ca8de082a14861d8f634a8386ba41" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02c3b/02c3bb643b15f2b887ee0cd9e70bcd87d79f5094" alt="Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung SL820 |
Also referred to as | - | IT100 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.50 m |
Flash options | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $280 | $280 |