Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally Known as ST50
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-50 was introduced 8 years later than the TL100 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the WG-50 scores versus the TL100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL100. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung TL100
| WG-50 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 102 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh WG-50
| TL100 | WG-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL100
| WG-50 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 has physical measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL100 has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-50 against the TL100.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-50 and TL100 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and TL100.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to show more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL100 |
| Also Known as | - | ST50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2017-05-24 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) | 219 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $280 | $22 |