Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is PL150
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and TL210 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-50 was released 7 years later than the TL210 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-50 grades against the TL210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL210. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung TL210
WG-50 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | January 2010 | More recent by 90 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Ricoh WG-50
TL210 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL210
WG-50 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-50 offers external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung TL210 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WG-50 compared to the TL210.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and TL210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and TL210.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to render more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL210 |
Alternative name | - | PL150 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2017-05-24 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $280 | $230 |