Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40


94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The WG-50 was manufactured 7 years after the TL225 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the WG-50 matches up against the TL225 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung TL225
WG-50 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 95 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh WG-50
TL225 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung TL225
WG-50 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-50 has external dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-50 against the TL225.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and TL225 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and TL225.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-50 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-50 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung TL225 |
Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2017-05-24 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 187g (0.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $280 | $488 |